Manufacturing companies with secondary costs that support primary activities must assign them to their products. Usually, they achieve this by allocating the costs using an allocation method. It allows companies to assign those costs to a specific product or unit. One such technique is known as the direct allocation method.
What is the Direct Allocation Method?
The direct allocation method is an accounting technique used to assign the costs of service departments, like IT or HR, directly to operating departments, such as manufacturing or sales. It bypasses the redistribution of expenses between service departments and instead focuses solely on allocating those costs to departments that directly generate revenue. This method typically uses a predetermined cost driver, such as labour hours or machine usage, to distribute expenses.
Though the direct allocation method is simple and easy to implement, it doesn’t account for the fact that service departments may support one another. This lack of inter-service cost allocation can make the method less precise than other allocation techniques, such as the step-down or reciprocal method, which provides more detailed cost distribution.
How does the Direct Allocation Method work?
The direct allocation method assigns costs from service departments, like IT or HR, directly to the operating departments, such as manufacturing or sales, without distributing them among other service departments. The process starts by calculating the total costs for each service department and then selecting a cost driver to allocate these costs to the relevant operating departments.
Once the cost driver is determined, service department expenses are distributed directly to operating departments based on usage. This method doesn’t consider that service departments may support each other and simplifies the allocation process. While straightforward, the method is less precise than others because it overlooks inter-service dependencies.
What are the advantages of the Direct Allocation Method?
The direct allocation method presents several advantages, primarily its simplicity and ease of implementation. This straightforward approach requires minimal calculations and avoids the complexities of redistributing costs among service departments, making it accessible for various organizations, especially smaller ones.
Furthermore, the direct allocation method facilitates effective budgeting and planning, as organizations can forecast future expenses based on allocated costs. It also enhances accountability, as department heads can see how service costs impact budgets, motivating better resource management. Additionally, this method streamlines financial reporting by offering a clear breakdown of costs, making financial reviews and analyses more efficient.
What are the disadvantages of the Direct Allocation Method?
The direct allocation method, while beneficial in some respects, has several notable disadvantages. One major drawback is its lack of accuracy, as it does not consider the interrelationships between service departments. This oversight can cause a misrepresentation of actual costs, particularly when one service department relies on another for support.
Another significant limitation is that the direct allocation method may provide limited insights for decision-making. By not allocating costs between service departments, it can obscure the efficiency and effectiveness of those services. Furthermore, if the chosen allocation base does not accurately reflect actual usage, the final information can be misleading.
Conclusion
The direct allocation method allows companies to allocate costs from supporting activities to their products or units. Primarily, companies achieve it by using cost drivers to assign various expenses. The direct allocation method is straightforward and can help streamline financial reporting. However, it can have some limitations, such as lower accuracy.
Further questions
What's your question? Ask it in the discussion forum
Have an answer to the questions below? Post it here or in the forum
Oil ticked higher after a volatile week as traders parsed the latest signals in the trade war, prepared for details of how China aims to support its economy, and weighed geopolitical developments in Iran.
