Inventory counting is a long and hectic process for companies. However, it is essential to avoid inventory loss. Companies may use various methods to conduct this count. One of these includes cycle counting.
What is Cycle Counting?
Cycle counting is an inventory management method that involves the regular and systematic counting of a subset of a company’s inventory within specified cycles instead of conducting a comprehensive physical count all at once. This approach aims to maintain accurate inventory records while minimizing disruptions to regular business operations. Cycle counting is distinguished by its strategic and proactive nature in inventory management.
Cycle counting typically includes categorizing items through ABC analysis based on their value, establishing a cycle count schedule, randomly selecting items for physical counting, and comparing the counted quantities with the records in the inventory management system. Any discrepancies during this process prompt investigations and adjustments to correct inventory records. Cycle counting offers advantages such as reduced disruption compared to annual physical counts, timely issue identification, and continuous accuracy maintenance.
How does Cycle Counting work?
Cycle counting is a systematic and efficient inventory management method focusing on regularly counting a subset of a company’s inventory in predetermined cycles. The process begins with an ABC analysis, categorizing items based on their importance or value. A cycle count schedule then gets established, determining when specific items are counted.
Notably, the randomness in selecting items ensures an unbiased and comprehensive assessment of inventory accuracy over time. During physical counts, items are examined manually or using advanced technologies like barcode scanners or RFID systems. The counted quantities are subsequently compared with the records in the inventory management system, and any identified discrepancies trigger investigations into root causes.
Adjustments are made to correct inventory records, and the data collected during cycle counting is analyzed to discern trends and recurring issues, driving continuous improvement efforts. This proactive approach to inventory accuracy minimizes disruptions compared to traditional physical counts and enables businesses to maintain precise and reliable inventory records throughout the year.
What is the difference between Cycle and Physical Counting?
Cycle counting differs from physical counting in various aspects. Some of the primary differences between the two approaches are as follows.
Frequency
Cycle counting involves counting a subset of inventory on a regular and systematic basis, often following a predetermined schedule. This approach spreads the counting effort throughout the year. In contrast, physical counting is typically conducted annually or periodically, requiring a comprehensive count of all inventory items.
Comprehensiveness
Cycle counting involves randomly selecting items for counting, ensuring that all items have an equal chance of being counted over time. In contrast, physical counting encompasses a complete count of all inventory items, offering a snapshot of the entire inventory at a specific time.
Accuracy
Cycle counting promotes continuous accuracy maintenance by addressing discrepancies promptly. On the other hand, physical counting relies on periodic accuracy checks, with adjustments made after the count. This approach may result in a larger window for discrepancies to go unnoticed until the next physical count.
Efficiency
Cycle counting can be more efficient when leveraging technology, such as barcode scanners or RFID systems. In contrast, physical counting may be less efficient, especially in large warehouses, as it often involves manual counting processes that are time-consuming and prone to human error.
Conclusion
Cycle counting is an inventory management approach to gauging inventory levels per scheduled cycle. This approach contrasts with a physical method where measurements occur after long periods. Cycle counting follows a more systematic and efficient approach and may utilize technology to enhance the process overall.
Further questions
What's your question? Ask it in the discussion forum
Have an answer to the questions below? Post it here or in the forum
The WSJ Dollar Index was down 0.4% to 98.73 — down for three of the past four trading days.
