Asset Price Dynamics and Trading Strategy’s PnL Volatility

Follow us on LinkedIn

In a previous post, we discussed how the dynamics of assets are priced in the options prices. We recently came across a newly published article [1] that explored the same topic but from a different perspective that does not involve options.

The conclusion of the new article [1] is consistent with the previous one [2]; that is, the volatilities of mean-reverting assets are smaller than those of assets that follow the GBM process. The reverse applies to trending assets.

In this post, we are going to investigate whether the mean-reverting/trending property of an asset has any impact on a trading strategy’s PnL volatility.

To do this, we first generate asset prices using Monte Carlo simulations. We evolve the asset prices in both mean-reverting and trending regimes for 500 days. We then apply a simple trading system to the simulated asset prices. The trading system is as follows,

Go LONG when the Relative Strength Index <40, SHORT when the Relative Strength Index >70

The picture below shows the Autocorrelation Functions (ACF) of the asset returns. Panels (a) and (b) present ACFs of the trending and mean-reverting assets respectively. It’s clear that the assets are trending and mean-reverting at lag 3, respectively.

Autocorrelation Functions of asset returns

Autocorrelation Functions of asset returns

The picture below shows the simulated equity curves of the trading strategy applied to the trending (a) and mean-reverting (b) assets. The starting capital is $100 in both cases.

Equity curves of the trading strategy

Equity curves of the trading strategy

Visually, we do not observe any difference in terms of PnL dispersion. Indeed, the standard deviation of the terminal wealth at day 500 is $18.9 in the case of the trending asset (a), and $17.3 in the case of the mean-reverting asset (b). Is the difference statistically significant? We don’t think so.

This numerical experiment shows that the PnL volatility of a trading strategy has little to do with the underlying asset’ mean-reverting/trending property. Maybe it depends more on the strategy itself? (Note that in this example, we utilize a mean-reverting strategy). What would happen at the portfolio level?

References

[1] L. Middleton, J. Dodd, S. Rijavec, Trading styles and long-run variance of asset prices, 2021, arXiv:2109.08242

[2] Liao, S.L. and Chen, C.C. (2006), The valuation of European options when asset returns are autocorrelated, Journal of Futures Markets, 26, 85-102.

Originally published on Relative Value Arbitrage

Further questions

What's your question? Ask it in the discussion forum

Have an answer to the questions below? Post it here or in the forum

LATEST NEWSAtos and Kretinsky End Talks, Narrowing Indebted Firm’s Options
Atos and Kretinsky End Talks, Narrowing Indebted Firm’s Options

Atos SE and Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky are parting ways.

Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSAurora Cannabis partners UK's Script Assist for easier patient access
Aurora Cannabis partners UK's Script Assist for easier patient access
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSLaura and Jeramey from 'Love Is Blind' had a messy split &mdash; here's what happened and where they stand now
Laura and Jeramey from 'Love Is Blind' had a messy split &mdash; here's what happened and where they stand now

"Love Is Blind" season 6 stars Laura and Jeramey got engaged but split after he reconnected with Sarah Ann, his other match from the pods.

Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSRoth/MKM raises Credo Technology stock PT to $30 on growth momentum
Roth/MKM raises Credo Technology stock PT to $30 on growth momentum
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSBumble down 8% on discouraging results and guidance; job cuts announced
Bumble down 8% on discouraging results and guidance; job cuts announced
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here

Leave a Reply