Trading Strategies Based on Roughness of Volatility

Follow us on LinkedIn

In quantitative finance, the asset price is often modeled as the Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM). The GBM model is a stochastic process that describes the evolution of a price or other measurable quantity over time, assuming that it is subject to small random fluctuations (or “noise”) at each point in time. The model is used to price options and other financial derivatives and is also a key ingredient in the Black-Scholes option pricing formula. The GBM model assumes that the autocorrelation of asset returns is zero.

Lately, there is some effort devoted to developing asset and options pricing models where the autocorrelation of the underlying asset returns is non-zero, i.e. the asset is mean-reverting or trending. In this context, Reference [1] examined trading strategies developed based on the autocorrelation property of asset price and volatility,

We have investigated strategies for trading stocks based on measures of roughness in their volatility. We have compared long-short strategies based on realized roughness (calculated from high-frequency stock returns) and implied roughness (calculated from option prices). Both measures support a strategy of buying stocks with rougher volatilities and selling stocks with smoother volatilities; but sorting on implied roughness yields higher returns and is more robust to controlling for other factors. In particular, it is robust to controlling for illiquidity and the level of the ATM skew.

We have argued that implied roughness provides a measure of near-term idiosyncratic risk: a stock with greater implied roughness is one that the market perceives to have downside uncertainty that will be resolved quickly. On this interpretation, the profitability of our rough- minus-smooth strategy reflects compensation for bearing this risk. The performance of our strategy is enhanced near earnings announcements, when stocks face elevated idiosyncratic risk, and it is suppressed near FOMC announcements, when the dominant near-term risk is systematic.

In short, the autocorrelation property, which is embedded in the roughness/smoothness of volatilities, can be exploited to develop profitable investment strategies. This article contributes to a small number of papers that study the trending/mean-reverting property of asset prices in trading and portfolio management.

References

[1] P. Glasserman and P. He, Buy Rough, Sell Smooth (2018). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3301669

Further questions

What's your question? Ask it in the discussion forum

Have an answer to the questions below? Post it here or in the forum

LATEST NEWSGreek firefighters tame wildfire on island of Serifos
Greek firefighters tame wildfire on island of Serifos
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSFrance begins voting in election that could hand power to far right
France begins voting in election that could hand power to far right
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSMore flight cancellations over the long weekend due to strike: WestJet
More flight cancellations over the long weekend due to strike: WestJet

A sudden strike by the WestJet mechanics union is forcing the airline to cancel more flights over the Canada Day long weekend, disrupting the plans of more than 49,000 travellers. The Calgary-based airline has already cancelled a total of 407 flights over the weekend in…

Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSMyanmar central bank denies UN report on weapons transactions
Myanmar central bank denies UN report on weapons transactions
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSRising trade policy uncertainty poses a downside risk to growth: Goldman Sachs
Rising trade policy uncertainty poses a downside risk to growth: Goldman Sachs
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here

Leave a Reply