Why and How Systematic Trading Strategies Decay After Going Live

Follow us on LinkedIn

Testing and validating a trading strategy is an important step in trading system development. It’s a commonly-known fact that a well-optimized trading strategy’s performance often deteriorates after it goes live. Thus, developing a robust strategy that performs well out-of-sample is quite a challenge. To this effect, we previously discussed a multiple testing framework for validating a trading strategy. A recent article [1] looks at the strategy’s robustness from a different perspective; it attempts to answer the question: why a strategy’s performance decays after going live.

To that effect we have proposed two hypothesis. The first one holds that the drop is a pure overfitting effect. In other words, the authors have fine-tuned the (on average) genuine effect to the data used for backtesting in order to make their findings more statistically significant. This finetuning went far beyond what the true effect was and thus only part of the performance is recovered out-of-sample. Second hypothesis posits that once a profitable strategy is disseminated, market participants move in in order to monetize the effect. This in turn weakens or even obliterates the effect going forward.

According to the article, the strategy’s decay is due to 2 effects: overfitting and arbitrage. The authors also pointed out that both effects are equally important,

In order to be able to tell which (if any) of these two hypothesis is more likely, we have constructed a set of explanatory variables for each hypothesis and use univariate regressions to test each variable separately. We find statistically significant coefficients for several variables from both sets. This suggests that both forces are at work and the decay in performance is a joint effect of these forces.

In brief, the article sheds some light on how and why a trading system’s performance deteriorates. However, an important question still remains to be answered: what can we do to mitigate these 2 effects?  Let us know what you think.

References

[1] Falck, Antoine and Rej, Adam and Thesmar, David, Why and How Systematic Strategies Decay (May 14, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3845928

Further questions

What's your question? Ask it in the discussion forum

Have an answer to the questions below? Post it here or in the forum

LATEST NEWSStocks making the biggest moves after hours: Adobe, RH, Oracle and more
Stocks making the biggest moves after hours: Adobe, RH, Oracle and more

These are the stocks posting the largest moves in extended trading.

Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSAdobe maintains $650 target despite F4Q guide concerns
Adobe maintains $650 target despite F4Q guide concerns
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSNTSB chair tells Boeing CEO that planemaker has safety culture problem
NTSB chair tells Boeing CEO that planemaker has safety culture problem
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSJudiciary refers ex-Alaska judge to US House for potential impeachment
Judiciary refers ex-Alaska judge to US House for potential impeachment
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSPrimis Financial Corp to restate financials over loan accounting errors
Primis Financial Corp to restate financials over loan accounting errors
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here

Leave a Reply