Is Correlation Modeled Correctly?

Subscribe to newsletter

Volatility is a concept that is relatively well understood and used widely in the financial market. Correlation, on the other hand, is less understood. Nevertheless, it is used frequently in trading and portfolio management.

Correlation between 2 assets is a measure that shows the strength of the relationship between them. The correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to +1, where a correlation of +1 indicates that the assets move in perfect lockstep, while a correlation of -1 indicates that they move in opposite directions. The closer the correlation coefficient is to +1 or -1, the stronger the relationship between the assets. However, it’s important to note that a correlation coefficient of zero does not mean that there is no relationship between the assets; it just means that the relationship is weak.

How do we model the correlation?

At first, one would think that correlation can be modeled easily. But this is actually not the case. The following discussion on StackExchange pointed out,

Subscribe to newsletter https://harbourfrontquant.beehiiv.com/subscribe Newsletter Covering Trading Strategies, Risk Management, Financial Derivatives, Career Perspectives, and More

Correlations are notoriously unstable in financial time series – yet one of the most used concepts in quant finance because their is no good theoretical substitute for it. You could say theory is not working with it yet neither without it.

For example the concept is used for diversification of uncorrelated assets or for the modelling of credit default swaps (correlation of defaults). Unfortunately when you need it most (e.g. a crash) it just vanishes. This is one of the reasons that the financial crises started because the quants modeled the cds’s with certain assumptions concerning default correlations – but when a regime shift happens this no longer works.

We agree with the author. Correlation is hard to model, and yet widely used in finance. Does anyone remember the financial crisis of 2008? Incorrect modeling of correlation played a big part in that crisis.

How do we choose non-correlated assets?

Unfortunately, it’s becoming harder and harder these days to find weakly correlated assets. Let’s take  Bitcoin as an example. It used to be an alternative asset that was weakly correlated with the stock market. But the correlation has become stronger these days.

Maybe one should focus his efforts on finding non-correlated trading strategies?

Further questions

What's your question? Ask it in the discussion forum

Have an answer to the questions below? Post it here or in the forum

LATEST NEWSCorcept therapeutics officer sells $20.2 million in stock
Corcept therapeutics officer sells $20.2 million in stock
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSOak Valley Bancorp director Terrance Withrow acquires $13,595 in stock
Oak Valley Bancorp director Terrance Withrow acquires $13,595 in stock
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSRing Energy director John A. Crum acquires $57,499 in stock
Ring Energy director John A. Crum acquires $57,499 in stock
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSEleven more Ukrainian children return home from Russia, Russian-held areas
Eleven more Ukrainian children return home from Russia, Russian-held areas
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSBrazil mulls 'all possible actions' as Congress lays framework for trade retaliation
Brazil mulls 'all possible actions' as Congress lays framework for trade retaliation
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here

Leave a Reply