Cointegration or Correlation, Which Method is Better for Pairs Trading?

Follow us on LinkedIn

Pairs trading or statistical arbitrage is a popular quantitative trading strategy. Basically, we choose a pair of assets for trading, and when the assets’ prices diverge, we bet on them to revert back to the mean. The assets are often stocks, but they can be anything, ranging from commodities, interest rate products, to exchange-traded funds.

To select a pair for trading, we often make a decision based upon,

  • Correlation of assets,
  • Cointegration of the underlyings, or
  • Other methods.

A common question we often ask ourselves is which method is superior. We used to believe that using correlation or cointegration does not matter, as long as the pair mean reverts. However, article [1] shed some light on the matter. After comparing different pair selection methods, the authors concluded that choosing pairs based on cointegration resulted in superior returns,

Our results confirm the weak excess returns observed in the recent publications for the minimum distance method. The trades initiated following the stationarity of the price ratio are not able to generate, after transaction costs, large and significant excess returns. The key empirical fact revealed by this study concerns cointegration. After controlling for risk factors, transaction costs and data-snooping biases, cointegration-based pairs trading exhibits high and robust positive alpha. During a period of more than 10 years, even the least profitable parameterization dealing with cointegration delivers excess returns greater than 1.38% per month. Returns can rise up to 5% per month. Cointegration reduces significantly nonconvergence risk.

The article stated that cointegration reduced divergence risks, but did not explain why. This will be an area for further research. Additionally, it also pointed out,

If pairs trading returns are not related to the equity premium, does the volatility/Vix index matter?  Do and Faff (2010) regress pairs returns against market volatility over the same month but did not find any significant effect. A new direction could analyse the influence of conditioning openings to a certain level of volatility/Vix.

Based on our experience, we used to think that pair trading is implicitly shorting volatility, but as the article pointed out, this might not be the case. We look forward to new research results to learn more as to why this is not the case.

References

[1] N. Huck and K. Afawubo, Pairs trading and selection methods: is cointegration superior?, Applied Economics, 47:6, 599-613, 2015

Further questions

What's your question? Ask it in the discussion forum

Have an answer to the questions below? Post it here or in the forum

LATEST NEWSThird Rock Ventures sells Tango Therapeutics shares worth nearly $1.9m
Third Rock Ventures sells Tango Therapeutics shares worth nearly $1.9m
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSPrimoris Services Corporation Schedules Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast
Primoris Services Corporation Schedules Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSFirst Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II Declares its Monthly Common Share Distribution of $0.097 Per Share for August
First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II Declares its Monthly Common Share Distribution of $0.097 Per Share for August
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSZions Bancorporation, National Association Reports Second Quarter Financial Results
Zions Bancorporation, National Association Reports Second Quarter Financial Results
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here
LATEST NEWSBancFirst corp executive sells shares worth over $210k
BancFirst corp executive sells shares worth over $210k
Stay up-to-date with the latest news - click here

Leave a Reply